Friday, 9 December 2016


1.    How does Kelman highlight the struggles of urban life in Pigeon English?

Struggles of urban life – Violence+ Gangs/ Drugs/ Lack of support+ Naivety / Fitting in

Lack of support+ Naivety

Police not friendly POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS

“chains hanging from his belt”

“acid spray” (pepper)

“guarding”

How does Kelman highlight the struggles of urban life in Pigeon English?

Violence and gangs

“”guts spill out”

“chook” X Fire “chocolate milk and cigarette breath” sweets interspersed with references to danger and death

Drugs

Crack spoon outside school gates

Fitting in

“nipples” harmed wearing the Arsenal shirt – replicate/ genuine

TATS – Text Author Task ref Summary


 

‘Pigeon English is a harrowing story by Stephen Kelman set in modern inner city London, and tells the story of the recently arrived immigrant Harri. The story is based firmly in the life and death of Damilola Taylor which occurred in Peckham several years ago, but which haunted Kelman and many others due to it highlighting the grim reality of life for immigrants, and the presence of gang violence which literally steals the lives of children. Kelman has written the book to highlight that, despite Taylor’s death having occurred some years ago, the issues still remain and the death toll rises; something which clearly disgusts Kellman and is shown in his grotesque imagery, frank language and cyclical structure which further highlights the ongoing vicious cycle of death. Kelman highlights the struggles of urban life which include: a lack of support to those living in gang areas and those who are immigrants, the presence of violence and gangs, drugs and an inability to fit in.

One of the struggles of urban life highlighted by Kelman is the lack of support offered to people like Harri (immigrants and those living in the presence of gangs). One way in which this lack of support is shown is on the very first page where Kelman writes of the a dead boy and we are told of the: POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS. Firstly the line is in a solitary paragraph, this emphasis the solitary nature of the police and that the police are apart from Harri and the community. Just as the paragraph stands apart, so do the police form the very people they should be supporting. Furthermore this line is in the very first page of the story, thus highlighting form the start the complete and utter lack of support offered to Harri and those in his community. At no point do the police support. This lack of support is furthered when we are told of the “chains hanging from his belt”. This is Harri describing a police officer to us. The word choice of hanging is associated with death, suicide and also suggests a lack of support and stability. This suggests that the police are not associated with care and protection, but in this urban life are associated with death and a lack of protection. Therefore through the use of structure and word choice, Kelman highlights one of the struggles of urban life being that the police do not offer support or protection.

Tuesday, 1 November 2016


Welcome to Pigeon English:


Pigeon English - writing about our text
Image result for pigeon english 

The main character’s name is interesting as it promotes the theme contained within the text that multiculturalism is a positive thing. We see this in the author’s choice of name for his main character: “Harrison Opoku”. Firstly the word choice of Harrison has suggestions of upper class status, is formal and is a name associated with the white culture,  perhaps this choice of name for his protagonist is the author’s way of ensuring the reader’s respect for the protagonist, and thus the culture he comes from and immigrants in general. In addition the name contains contrast as the forename is associated with the western culture, and the surname is clearly associated with Africa – by using contrast in his name it could be argued that the writer is suggesting that we are all multicultural and hinting at the possibility of opposing cultures  coming together.

Wednesday, 26 October 2016

General Class Feedback from Mock

Image result for learning from mistakes quotesImage result for learning from mistakes quotesImage result for learning from mistakes quotes
Image result for learning from mistakes quotes
Q1 - ensure the information comes from the specified lines (not the introductory box)
- ensure you only make one point per line (e.g. he has inky fingers and bitten nails is two points and should be made in two lines: he has inky fingers/ he has bitten nails)

- avoid inferring in this question or paraphrasing as the danger here is that your words alter the meaning from the original in the passage and so you cannot get the marks
- keep it simple: take the phrases directly from the passage in a way that they make sense standing alone

Q2 - you must give an overarching answer to the question before launching into identification and analysis of language devices. This overarching answer is your 'anchor' and all of your analysis must tie back to this.
This question requires one overarching answer and three quotes that back this up. for example: Brighton is described positively as a place of beauty and intrigue as shown in thr writers use of word choice: "sparkled" "glittering" "silver". If you then analysed the connotations of each of these words and linked back to the overarching answer you would get 8 marks.

You could of course have an overarching answer that Brighton is described negatively and refer to the word choice of: "bewildered" "pale" and "lost"

But the formula is:
Overarching answer, three quotes/ devices that do this and analysis of the three.



Thursday, 20 October 2016

English Literature 8702/2  Paper 2 Modern texts and poetry
2 hours 15 minutes

Answer one question from Section A, one question from Section B and both questions in Section C.

The maximum mark for this paper is 96. • AO4 will be assessed in Section A. There are 4 marks available for AO4 in Section A in addition to 30 marks for answering the question. AO4 assesses the following skills: Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling and punctuation. • There are 30 marks for Section B and 32 marks for Section C.

In ‘Mental Cases, how does the poet present the consequences of war on the soldiers?



The poet presents a consequence of war on the soldiers as being that war has ravaged the men and they are forever changed and lessened. The soldiers are described by the speaker using a metaphor as being: “purgatorial shadows”. Just as a shadow is not a concrete being, provokes fear in others and is impossible to touch so the soldiers are no longer their full selves, are feared by others and can no longer be reached. The war has diminished them to being an abstract object and not as substantial as human beings and so lessened.

The poet presents a consequence of war on the soldiers as that it leaves the soldiers forsaken and lacking even protection by their faith. This is shown when a metaphor is used to describe the soldiers as: “purgatorial shadows”.

Just as purgatory is halfway between heaven and hell, for those who have lived an imperfect life and a place which is often forgotten about, so the soldiers are neither in the land of the living or dead, have experienced and been a part of things that are considered by some to be wrong (murder) and they have also been forgotten by the nation. This highlights the idea that the men are no longer in a concrete place but are hanging between two very different places and are even unable to be saved by God.
 
The second unseen poetry question is marked out of 8 and you have two things to do in your answer:

 (i) Compare the use of language and structure in the poems using subject terminology correctly

What techniques do they both use? Is it to the same effect? Are they structured in the same way?What differences are there and why?

(ii) Compare the effects of the writer’s methods on the reader

Do they evoke the same emotions/ feelings/ so they portray the linked topic in the same way/ do they contain the same ideas…
 

Friday, 14 October 2016


English Language Paper 1

       20 marks

       20 minutes

       Key question if you want an A*,A or top B grade.

       12.5% of your entire GCSE Grade

Hi I’m Question 4, let me tell you a bit about myself.

I’m a culmination of the skills you have demonstrated in Qs1,2 and 3.

I am assessing you on your ability to:

Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas. Select and synthesise evidence from different texts.

Explain, comment on and analyse how writers use language and structure to achieve effects and influence readers, using relevant subject terminology to support their views.

What does Q4 look like:

Focus this part of your answer on the second part of the source,

A student, having read this section of the text said: “The writer brings the very different characters to life for the reader. It is as if you are inside the coach with them.” 

To what extent do you agree?       (YOU WILL ALL AGREE)

In your response, you could:          ( AQA ARE BEING POLITE, YOU WILL WORK THROUGH THE THREE BULLET POINTS)

• write about your own impressions of the characters

• evaluate how the writer has created these impressions

 • support your opinions with references to the text.

 

• write about your own impressions of the characters

=Point

• evaluate how the writer has created these impressions

=Evaluation

 • support your opinions with references to the text.

=Evidence

 

You are given a statement and your job is to prove the statement’s truth.

You prove it by identifying language and structural devices and analysing them.

Can you: convince, select, and explain?

(Imagine you are a lawyer arguing to prove the statement in a court).


 

A student, having read this section of the text, said: “This part of the text, explaining what Clarissa sees, shows how much she loves her city. It reminds me of the first introduction to her “Clarissa was positive”.”
To what extent do you agree?
In your response, you could:
· consider your own impressions of how Clarissa  feels about London
· evaluate how the writer creates this love for the city
· support your opinions with references to the text.

For having lived in Westminster — how many years now? over twenty — one feels even in the midst of the traffic, or waking at night, Clarissa was positive, a particular hush, or solemnity; an indescribable pause; a suspense (but that might be her heart, affected, they said, by influenza) before Big Ben strikes. There! Out it boomed. First a warning, musical; then the hour, irrevocable. The leaden circles dissolved in the air. Such fools we are, she thought, crossing Victoria Street. For Heaven only knows why one loves it so, how one sees it so, making it up, building it round one, tumbling it, creating it every moment afresh; but the veriest frumps, the most dejected of miseries sitting on doorsteps (drink their downfall) do the same; can’t be dealt with, she felt positive, by Acts of Parliament for that very reason: they love life. In people’s eyes, in the swing, tramp, and trudge; in the bellow and the uproar; the carriages, motor cars, omnibuses, vans, sandwich men shuffling and swinging; brass bands; barrel organs; in the triumph and the jingle and the strange high singing of some aeroplane overhead was what she loved; life; London; this moment of June.

Task A

Language devices:

Read the extract carefully and identify all words and phrases in the extract that shows how much she “she loves her city”.

Then for each word and phrase you have quoted, identify a device.

You might have identified the following language devices that show how much she “she loves her city” :

Repetition of positive

Alliteration: “love life”

Hyperbole: “bellow”

Onomatopoeia: “uproar”

Repetition of “swing”

Musical theme: “brass bands…organs…singing”

Word choice: “triumph”

Word choice: “jingle”

Personification of the plane “singing”

 

Over to you. Now choose three of the language devices we have identified and analyse each one to show answer the question:

A student, having read this section of the text, said: “This part of the text, explaining what Clarissa sees, shows how much she loves her city It reminds me of the first introduction to her “Clarissa was positive”.”
To what extent do you agree?
In your response, you could:
· consider your own impressions of how Clarissa  feels about London
· evaluate how the writer creates this love for the city
· support your opinions with references to the text.

You should also include structural devices and analysis of these in your answer (you need to work for those 20 marks)

Now re-read the extract looking for structural devices that convey how much she loves her city.

Remember – structure is how things are arranged within sentences, paragraphs etc.

Structural features can be:  at a whole text level eg. beginnings / endings / perspective shifts; at a paragraph level eg. topic change / aspects of cohesion; and at a sentence level when judged to contribute to whole structure.

You might have identified:

Large sentences

Parenthetical statement of (Drink their downfall)

Listing

Climax in list of all of the methods of transport

Listing of musical actions

Climactic sentences

Alliterative ending “loved; life;London” also short one word lists separated by semi-colon which is unusual as it is a short item but the semi colon is used to separate large items (so what does this suggest???)


 

 
Focus this part of your answer on the second part of the source which has been italicised.
A student, having read this section of the text said: “The writer brings the party to life for the reader. It is as if you are inside one of Jay Gatsby’s parties.”
 
To what extent do you agree?
 
In your response, you could:
 
       write about your own impressions of the characters
       evaluate how the writer has created these impressions
       support your opinions with references to the text.
 
Section A: Reading Literary Fiction: Source A
 
This extract is from the novel ‘The Great Gatsby’ by F Scott Fitzgerald.  Here, a character named Nick describes the elaborate parties Jay Gatsby throws most nights throughout the summer.  Although the novel is set in Long Island during the summer of 1922, it was written in 1925.
 
There was music from my neighbor’s house through the summer nights. In his blue gardens men and girls came and went like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and the stars. At high tide in the afternoon I watched his guests diving from the tower of his raft or taking the sun on the hot sand of his beach while his two motor-boats slit the waters of the Sound, drawing aquaplanes over cataracts of foam. On week-ends his Rolls-Royce became an omnibus, bearing parties to and from the city, between nine in the morning and long past midnight, while his station wagon scampered like a brisk yellow bug to meet all trains. And on Mondays eight servants including an extra gardener toiled all day with mops and scrubbing-brushes and hammers and garden-shears, repairing the ravages of the night before.
Every Friday five crates of oranges and lemons arrived from a fruiterer in New York—every Monday these same oranges and lemons left his back door in a pyramid of pulpless halves. There was a machine in the kitchen which could extract the juice of two hundred oranges in half an hour, if a little button was pressed two hundred times by a butler’s thumb.
At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to make a Christmas tree of Gatsby’s enormous garden. On buffet tables, garnished with glistening horsd’oeuvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.
By seven o’clock the orchestra has arrived—no thin fivepiece affair but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos and low and high drums. The last swimmers have come in from the beach now and are dressing upstairs; the cars from New York are parked five deep in the drive, and already the halls and salons and verandas are gaudy with primary colors and hair shorn in strange new ways and shawls beyond the dreams of Castile. The bar is in full swing and floating rounds of cocktails permeate the garden outside until the air is alive with chatter and laughter and casual innuendo and introductions forgotten on the spot and enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other’s names.
The lights grow brighter as the earth lurches away from the sun and now the orchestra is playing yellow cocktail music and the opera of voices pitches a key higher. Laughter is easier, minute by minute, spilled with prodigality, tipped out at a cheerful word. The groups change more swiftly, swell with new arrivals, dissolve and form in the same breath—already there are wanderers, confident girls who weave here and there among the stouter and more stable, become for a sharp, joyous moment the center of a group and then excited with triumph glide on through the seachange of faces and voices and color under the constantly changing light.
Suddenly one of these gypsies in trembling opal, seizes a cocktail out of the air, dumps it down for courage and moving her hands like Frisco dances out alone on the canvas platform. A momentary hush; the orchestra leader varies his rhythm obligingly for her and there is a burst of chatter as the erroneous news goes around that she is Gilda Gray’s understudy from the ‘Follies.’ The party has begun.
 
 
 

Self Assessment
Either with highlighters or by labelling through numbers, review your answer to show where you have included:

  1. Evaluates the effects
  2. Subject Terminology
  3. Textual detail
  4. linked/ referred to the question’s statement

Exemplar answer

 

Firstly the writer brings the party to life by his use of contrast in his description of the orchestra as he states it is not a “thin fivepiece” but  a “whole pitful of…” This contrast emphasises the large, grand musical accompaniment the party has and this is is done more so by the contrast being compared to not one instrument but five, thus showing that five is considered “thin” to Gatsby, thus highlighting the extreme decadence of the music arrangement. Furthermore the writer brings the party to life by then listing the many instruments in the “pitful”. Listing the instruments individually highlights the great array of instruments and thus the incredible sound that these make – the brass, string and drums show it is a full band with an array of instruments and sounds adding to the vivacious atmosphere of the party. Also by detailing every instrument it allows the reader to, arrange the items in their head and imagine the many, many sounds, thus bringing it further to life.

The writer also uses word choice to describe the verandas as “gaudy”. “Gaudy” has suggestions of extravagance, of being vibrant, overwhelming and decadent thus brining the part to life for the reader as we realise the richness of the interior design.

Furthermore the writer uses hyperbole to bring the party to life as we are told of how the earth “lurches away from the sun”. The word choice of
“lurches” exaggerates how far from reality the guests become as the party continues and the guests become ensconced in their own world. The hyperbolic statement implies that the party is out of this world thus brining it to life for the reader by showing how incredible and other worldly it is.